The layers of our life. Our creative lifestyle creates exceptional forms. A life cycle in digital experimentation offers very little, except that it can capture the polymeric layers that we make.
Can we let digital life speak on our behalf? Can we let online Johnny sell us an ideal we don’t honestly believe in? There are no blurs in my mind that sell me an artificial field of study.
Research and probing are real writing; I’m not going to research how and why Johnny occurred in the digital world, because that’s been done a million times over, and I don’t care!
I’ve said before, work from a single sentence. Create via problem solving, via determination in your own words, because Johnny isn’t a stagehand or the stage manager.
People state that the media are to blame. Why would I believe that? Nothing tells me that an online newspaper article will change my thinking, for better or for worse. Till death do us part, the media are part of the global influence. But they are not the real problem. The problem is greater; it’s a generic problem that we can’t ignore.
Flood the problem; let it swim into your mind, create the layers, and think for yourself.
Be creative in how you read, and weigh in as a featherweight when you write.
Photo by Pawel Czerwinski on Unsplash
Thanks for your entry Karl. It feels like I need a degree in subtext to really understand what it means.
Reading between the lines I think your message is that anything we read online should be taken with a pinch of salt and we should always be careful to form our own opinions.
If I'm wrong, then I'm miles away, but that's the thing with writing isn't it, not everyone will "get" it, and not everyone will come to the same conclusions as each other, or that the author intended.